Research article Open Access Logo

Assessment and Analysis of Gas Flow Temperature in Gas Production: A Case Study in VietNam

Dũng Quốc Tạ 1, *
Anh Đức Đỗ 2
  1. HCMUT
Correspondence to: Dũng Quốc Tạ, HCMUT. Email: [email protected].

Online metrics


Statistics from the website

  • Abstract Views: 1664
  • Galley Views: 668

Statistics from Dimensions

This article is published with open access by Viet Nam National University, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0) which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. 

Abstract

In this study, a comprehensive model is introduced for predicting fluid flow temperature in gas wells, integrating the mechanical energy bal-ance equation with convection, conduction, and radiation modes of heat transfer. The pressure calculation process is enhanced by the incorpo-ration of the Gray correlation. The key findings reveal a remarkable consistency between the proposed model and measured data, demonstrating deviations of only 0.34% and 0.63% for pressure loss prediction and temperature distribution along the borehole, respectively. Nodal analysis emerges as a valuable technique, enabling precise calculations of pressure and temperature in the wellbore and reservoir flow. Through sensitiv-ity analysis, the study evaluates the impact of various factors, such as tubing size and production rate, on temperature and pressure in the well-bore, considering both wellhead and bottom hole locations. Conclusions drawn from the sensitivity analysis underscore the significant influ-ence of changes in flow rate on temperature along the production tubing, with an increase from 20 to 100 mmscf/d resulting in a temperature rise from 150 to 300 oF. Tubing size is identified as a crucial determinant in pressure loss calculations, showing a slight decrease in wellhead temperature from 281 to 252 oF when increasing tubing size from 3 to 5.5 inches at a fixed production rate. However, variations in tubing di-ameter exhibit substantial effects on temperature and pressure under different operating production rates.

Comments